Legal · Signal-Fire Advisory

Governed for professional practice

The architecture survives contact with a risk committee because every client-facing artifact is solicitor-signed and no "opinion" is machine-issued.

Agent capabilities

Matter management

  • Automated intake & categorisation
  • Deadline tracking with alerts
  • Workload balancing

Document drafting

  • Template generation, solicitor-signed
  • Custom-clause flagging for review
  • Version control & audit trail

Portal preparation

  • SLA / HDB / CPF forms staged
  • One-click human execution
  • No screen-scraping

Authorities assistant

  • Grounded case & statute retrieval
  • Mandatory citation checking
  • Lawyer forms the opinion — not the agent
What changes vs. the generic pitch

Aligned to how firms are actually told to use GenAI

Solicitor sign-off, always

Every client-facing artifact is drafted by an agent and approved by a solicitor. No "full automation / no review" shortcuts.

No machine opinions

The research agent surfaces authorities and cite-checks them. The legal opinion is the lawyer's, per MinLaw guidance.

Confidentiality preserved

Grounded on the firm's knowledge base; Singapore-hosted / zero-retention options; PDPA-aligned processing.

Human-in / on-the-loop

We adopt the Guide's taxonomy explicitly and map each workflow to the right oversight level.

By invitation

Bringing this to your firm

This walkthrough is extended to selected conveyancing and property-law practices in Singapore. Book a 30-minute readiness teardown of one of your own workflows — we map it against the Agentic-AI governance framework and leave you with a costed, grant-eligible next step. No obligation.

Request the teardown Message on WhatsApp