The architecture survives contact with a risk committee because every client-facing artifact is solicitor-signed and no "opinion" is machine-issued.
Every client-facing artifact is drafted by an agent and approved by a solicitor. No "full automation / no review" shortcuts.
The research agent surfaces authorities and cite-checks them. The legal opinion is the lawyer's, per MinLaw guidance.
Grounded on the firm's knowledge base; Singapore-hosted / zero-retention options; PDPA-aligned processing.
We adopt the Guide's taxonomy explicitly and map each workflow to the right oversight level.
This walkthrough is extended to selected legal practices in Singapore. The worked example is conveyancing; the same governance model applies across litigation, corporate and private-client work. Book a 30-minute readiness teardown of one of your own workflows — we map it against the Agentic-AI governance framework and leave you with a costed, grant-eligible next step. No obligation.